‘’Reunion’’ by John Cheever

A. An es understand analyzing the improvident falsehood This essay is divergence to be an analysis and interpretation of the briefly business relationship Reunion by John Cheever. It will begin with a summary of the curtly story. Afterwards the plot, the conflict and the scope will be analyzed. Then Ill move on to the suitization, the possible move endpoint and the theme and message. Finally I will draw parallels between the short story Reunion and the essay Living With Strangers by Siri Hustvedt. Reunion is a short story about a boy called Charlie and his put up fundamental interaction with his paternity.Charlie was travelling by train from his grandm otherwises to a bungalow his suffer had rented. He would be in New York for about an arcminute and thirty minutes while waiting for the new train and thus he indispensablenessed to meet his father. He hadnt seen his father for triad years and Charlie was exited to see the man he looked up to again. Because of the lack of sentence, they couldnt go and see the fathers club, so they had to find a restaurant in the argona. They went to four restaurants and they get more or slight thrown out of all four. The father in this short story was either really drunk or/and actually domineering.In all make he talked down to waiters or behaved bad in one counseling or the other. In spite of his bad behavior they managed to get a Beefeater Gibson at one place. It all ended with the father going up to a newsstand, again with a bad attitude, which was the final husk for Charlie who said Goodbye, daddy and walked towards the station. That was the last time Charlie axiom his father. This short story is one overlarge flashback. The whole story is a flashback that concedes chronologically. It starts with a rattling short introduction in which Charlie just says The last time I saw my father was in Grand Central Station., and from thereon he tells the story as a flashback.The conflict in this story is the so aring expectations from Charlie. Charlie admires his father truly much, but when he meets him, hes an arrogant and probably drunk jerk. Three years have gone, since they last saw each other and that is a long time. People can stir a lot during three years and this is probably what also happened to the father or else Charlie just remembered him differently. The end shows that the conflict was too much to stomach for Charlie as he says that was the last time I saw my father. .The movement why it was the last time they saw each other is probably because of the disappointment Charlie must have felt. Probably he doesnt want to see his former hero anymore, because he actually is a jerk. The setting compacts places in New York City or more precisely most the Grand Central Station. Furthermore it takes place in four restaurants and by a newsstand. It is most likely to take place in the last half of the 20th century. It was first published in 1962, but the view could still take place today. The fact that Charlies parents are dissociate also makes the story more modern, since that problem is very common nowadays.Back in that time where it was written it was unusual to be divorced, actually it was almost weird. straightaway let?s move on to the characterizations. Charlie is the main character and hes probably a young boy. He lives with his mother, as his parents are divorced. His age is non mentioned, but in the text there is a line that makes him sound young I knew that when I was grown I would be something like him. This makes the reader picture him as a minor as he says when I was grown. But o the other exit later on he drinks alcohol with his father, which makes him seem to be almost a grownup.To begin with, he looks very much up to his father, that changes and it all ends with him not deficient to be with his father and actually neer wanting to see him again. During the story he doesnt really say much. Of course hes the narrator, but it is the father who leads the conversations. The father owns a club and has a secretary. He smells of a rich compound of whiskey and after-shave lotion, raiment polish, woollens, and the rankness of a mature male. . The fact that he smells partly of whiskey suggests that he had been drinking. His behavior could also verify that, as he behaved like an unstable psyche.He could also just be very, very arrogant as he almost feels that he is more than for spokesperson the waiters. He talks down to people and is generally very unpleasant. neither his name or age is mentioned, but he might be in the mid-forties. The characters are immediately told about by the narrator for employment in this part of the text I smelled my father the way my mother sniffs a rose. It was a rich compound of whiskey and after-shave lotion, shoe polish, woollens, and the rankness of a mature male. He describes his father directly with a comment on his smell.It is called direct characterization The father is a flat characte r he remains the same throughout the story. He remains being a jerk, while Charlie is a round character as he develops throughout the story. At first he is hallucinating to see his father again, but he ends up not wanting to ever see him again. We are dealing with a first person narrator, who in this story is the protagonist. The ending could be seen as a surprise ending since Charlie starts being excited to see his father but ends up saying Goodbye and never wanting to see him again.On the other hand it isnt really surprising, as the father throughout the story seems very unpleasant and maybe even embarrassing to be around. It is a guinea pig of argument. The themes in this short story are love, father and son relationship, expectations, subvert of alcohol, disappointment (the grass isnt always greener on the other side) and the sullen word goodbye. The message here must be not to have too high expectations and that people change. Now its time to draw parallels between Reunion and Living With Strangers. These two stories both take place in New York and they both touch the subject the conflict with strangers.In Living With Strangers the narrator tells us about strange strangers, but in Reunion Charlies father actually is the strange stranger. He tag the people he talks down to, with his boisterousness. They will maybe deliberate back some time of the drunk/arrogant jerk, who thought he owned the world. Generally these two stories show the two sides of a story. Another parallel could be the not making a full-grown deal out of something. The waiters f. ex. dont make a big deal out of the boisterousness, they just send Charlies father outside. That is the affect IT ISNT HAPPENING-rule.